Home | About Us | Current Issue | Ahead of print | Archives | Search | Instructions | Subscription | Feedback | Editorial Board | e-Alerts | Login 
Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons
     Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons
Official journal of the Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons         
 Users Online:105 
  Print this page Email this page   Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
 
Year : 2003  |  Volume : 8  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 169-174

Posterior urethral valve : the current perspective


Dept. of Pediatric Urology Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust, London WC1 3JH

Correspondence Address:
PG Duffy
Dept. of Pediatric Urology Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust, London WC1 3JH

Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

ABSTRACT: The posterior urethral valve is the commonest cause of bladder outlet obstruction in children. With the improvement of primary health care system and due to the widespread use of ultrasonography during antenatal checkup the incidence of early diagnosis of posterior urethral valve has increased. The ultrasonography, estimation of blood biochemistry and micturating cystourethrography are the primary modes of investigation in the postnatal period. After an initial period of catheterization and vasodilatation by administration of fluid and electrolytes, endoscopic rsection of valve is the first choice of treatment. The technique of endoscopic valve resection has been standardized. The neonatal resectoscope (9F) cannot be used in many premature or small for date babies. Although major improvement has been made, further miniaturization of the neonatal resectoscope is the need of the day. Vesicostomy is the preferred form of temporary urinary diversion, without any long term morbidity. Supravesical diversion has limited but definite role. There are very few long term follow up studies of posterior urethral valve managed on a uniform protocol. Our knowledge about the pathophysiology of the patient with posterior urethral valves, ability to perform video urodynamics and apply it to plan the treatment has improved. The ongoing prospective studies will define the exact role of invasive urodynamics and the scope of secondary surgical intervention.






[PDF Not available]*


        
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2071    
    Printed85    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded168    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 


Contact us | Sitemap | Advertise | What's New | Copyright and Disclaimer | Privacy Notice

 © 2005 - Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 

Online since 1st May '05