|Year : 2022 | Volume
| Issue : 4 | Page : 419-427
Fifty most influential articles on anorectal malformations: A tribute through bibliometric ranking
Anjan Kumar Dhua1, Vipan Kumar1, Ashwani Kumar Mishra2, Vishesh Jain1, Devendra Yadav1, Minu Bajpai1, Sandeep Agarwala1, Prabudh Goel1
1 Department of Paediatric Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Science, New Delhi, India
2 National Drug Dependence Treatment Centre, All India Institute of Medical Science, New Delhi, India
|Date of Submission||01-Jun-2021|
|Date of Decision||13-Sep-2021|
|Date of Acceptance||29-Sep-2021|
|Date of Web Publication||26-Jul-2022|
Department of Paediatric Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Science, Room No 4002, Teaching Block, New Delhi - 110 029
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Background: With the global assimilation of “publish and perish” culture into institutional academics, there has been an exponential rise in the publication numbers. There are ~2500 PUBMED entries related to “anorectal malformation (ARM).” The young clinician in his pursuit to translate experimental research to bedside often finds himself lost “in the midst of plenty.” This bibliometric analysis has been conducted to codify the seminal work on ARM for future reference and pay tribute to the most impactful articles.
Materials and Methods: Thomson Reuters Web of Science citation indexing database and research platform was used to retrieve the most cited articles in ARM using appropriate search strings. The characteristics (name of authors, the total number of authors, the title of publication, journal of publication, year of publication, etc.,) of the 50 top-cited articles were analyzed.
Results: The analysis revealed that the Journal of Paediatric Surgery was leading the choice of journal for publication. While most of the publications originated from the United States of America, Alberto Pena was the most influential author. The most studied topic was on associated malformations, and the most common study design was cohort studies.
Conclusion: The approach of citation analysis provided us an opportunity to retrieve the most influential articles on ARM. The trends in research in ARM have also been analyzed, spreading over five decades.
Keywords: Anorectal malformation, bibliometric analysis, citations, Web of Science
|How to cite this article:|
Dhua AK, Kumar V, Mishra AK, Jain V, Yadav D, Bajpai M, Agarwala S, Goel P. Fifty most influential articles on anorectal malformations: A tribute through bibliometric ranking. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg 2022;27:419-27
|How to cite this URL:|
Dhua AK, Kumar V, Mishra AK, Jain V, Yadav D, Bajpai M, Agarwala S, Goel P. Fifty most influential articles on anorectal malformations: A tribute through bibliometric ranking. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg [serial online] 2022 [cited 2022 Aug 9];27:419-27. Available from: https://www.jiaps.com/text.asp?2022/27/4/417/352272
| Introduction|| |
Anorectal malformations (ARMs) encompass a variety of congenital malformations affecting the distal anus and rectum of both boys and girls. Other associated anomalies can be seen in the urinary and genitourinary tracts as well as several other organ systems. The occurrence is approximately 1 in 5000 live births. Several approaches and surgical techniques were propounded that continued to get refined over the subsequent centuries till the 1980s when the posterior sagittal approach was put forward by Peña and DeVries. Over the years, better anatomical delineation, a better understanding of the anatomy and physiology of the anorectal region at birth have standardized the diagnosis and initial management of neonates with ARM.
The concept of bibliographical analysis helps us understand the influence of these papers on the research landscape and provides us with an insight into the most influential papers published. The process involves examining the citation history of an individual publication and obtaining additional quantitative data on different aspects of the paper such as the authors, institute, and country of origin of the research. Many surgical specialties such as general surgery, plastic surgery, trauma, orthopedic surgery, cardiothoracic surgery, and even pediatric surgery have deployed bibliometric analysis in different dimensions.,,,, However, the territory of ARM remains unexplored on this front.
To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first study trying to explore the characteristics of the top 50 cited articles published on the subject over the past 50 years (1969–2019). The current analysis has been conducted to codify the seminal work on ARM for future reference and pay tribute to the most impactful articles. The analysis is also expected to be considered as a reference for the most influential papers on ARM during the study period in years to come.
| Materials and Methods|| |
Thomson Reuters Web of Science citation indexing database and research platform (Web of Science core collection database maintained by Clarivate Analytics) was used to conduct the search. The “Topic” field and the “Title” field were searched using the search string “ARM OR anorectal atresia OR anal atresia OR imperforate anus” with a filter applied to include publications from January 01, 1970, to December 31, 2019. The dataset was further filtered to include only English language manuscripts and those indexed under the Science Citation Index Expanded, Conference Proceedings Citation Index, or Emerging Sources Citation Index. Articles thus obtained were reviewed, and the data entered into an Excel® spreadsheet. The process of data retrieval and data entry was completed in 24 hours, and the master chart was frozen on May 10, 2021. The various parameters recorded were the name of authors, the total number of authors, the title of publication, journal of publication, year of publication, country and the institute of the first author, and the type of paper. The quality of the articles was gauzed by the total number of citations and the average number of citations received per year (calculated by the number of total citations by the number of years since publication). Among multi-institutional studies and studies with more than six authors, the first six authors only were considered for analysis. For this study, we categorized the papers as original papers (basic science/animal study/clinical study/cohort studies/retrospective comparative study), review article, and case report or small case series. Subgroup analysis was done between collaborative articles and single-institution articles and articles published in pediatric surgery-specific journals and those published in nonpediatric surgery-specific journals.
The summary information (journal, year of publication, number of citations, and the average citations received per year) of the top 50 most cited articles in ARM is depicted in [Table 1]. The detailed analysis of the top 50 most cited articles in ARM with regard to the journal of publication and the citations received is provided in [Table 2]. The bivariate distribution of the 50 most cited article was assessed in terms of three parameters across the pediatric-specific journal and nonpediatric-specific journals [Table 3]. These three parameters were number of articles, total citations, and the citations per article. The test of significant difference in the proportion of articles and citations was assessed by the Z-test for two proportions. The last parameter (citation per article) was a ratio statistic. The null hypothesis under this scenario was that the rate ratio of citation across two specialties was equal to one against the alternative hypothesis that it is different from one. This was assessed by the help of a suitable R command by declaring the total variable citations and the total cited article as the vector and applying the exact rate ratio test, assuming Poisson count. A P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Data entry was done using Microsoft Excel®, and statistical analysis was performed using licensed Stata/SE version 12.0. Institutional review board approval was not sought, as the database that was being analyzed was already available in the electronic form in the public domain.
|Table 1: Summary of the top 50 most cited articles in anorectal malformation|
Click here to view
|Table 2: Detailed analysis of the top 50 most cited articles in anorectal malformation with regards to the journal of publication and the citations received|
Click here to view
|Table 3: The differences observed among the articles published in pediatric surgery specific journal or otherwise|
Click here to view
| Results|| |
A total of 1510 articles were retrieved in the Web of Science search with a total no of 18,320 citations (average 11.42 citation/article) on these articles. After arranging these 1510 articles in descending order of citations received, the top 50 articles were considered for further analysis. These top 50 articles are described in with their corresponding citation counts [Table 1].
These 50 articles received a total of 4796 citations (average 47.96 citations/article). The maximum citation count registered was 470, and the minimum noted was 54. When the average number of citations received per year was considered, the top 3 rankings were secured by the article numbers 2, 4, and 1, respectively [Table 1].
These top 50 articles were published between the year 1969 and 2011. These 50 articles were published in 21 journals and are illustrated in [Table 2]. Out of these 21 journals, the journal with the highest number of articles in the ranking of the 50 top-cited articles was the “Journal of Pediatric surgery” (JPS) (n = 26, 2237 citations). The second rank was secured by the “American Journal of Medical Genetics” (n = 3, 380 citations). There were two journals in the third place (archives of diseases in childhood and journal of pediatrics) with two papers each and 121 and 580 citations, respectively. In addition, there were 19 other journals that had at least one article in the list of the 50 top-cited articles [Table 2].
There were three journals that were pediatric surgery specific (JPS, Pediatric surgery international and Seminars in pediatric surgery), accounting for 28 of the 50 articles (2380 citations, 49.6% of total citations received by the 50 articles); the rest 22 articles were published in nonpediatric surgery-specific journals (2416 citations, 50.4% of total citations received by the 50 articles). The comparative analysis between the pediatric surgery-specific journals and the nonpediatric surgery-specific journals is tabulated in [Table 3].
The distribution of these fifty articles over the five decades of the study period is illustrated in [Figure 1]. The most productive in terms of the most influential articles were published between 2000 and 2009 with 19/50 (38%); in contrast, only one article (2%) of the top 50 cited articles was published between 2010 and 2019, receiving 58 citations. Before the year 2000, a trend of gradual increase in the number of articles which found a place in the top 50 cited articles as well as their corresponding citations was noted from the year 1969 onward [Figure 1].
|Figure 1: A graphical description of the number of top 50 most cited articles in anorectal malformation articles and the citations received over various time frames of the study period|
Click here to view
Maximum number of studies (n = 25, 2740 citations) were from the United States of America (USA), followed by Finland (n = 6, 461 citations), Netherlands (n = 5, 292 citations), and Canada (n = 3, 286 citations). The United Kingdom and Germany had two articles, each with 122 and 369 citations, respectively. Australia, Japan, Peoples Republic of China, South Korea, Saudi Arabia, and Switzerland were the country of origin of one article, each in the top 50 rankings with total citations of 526 citations. The number of articles having a contribution from more than one institute was 12. The number of institutes contributing to these 12 multi-institutional (collaborative) articles ranged from 2 to 21 institutes with a median of 3. Further analysis of these two categories of articles (single institution vs. collaborative) is projected in [Table 4]. It was observed that the total citations received were significantly more in the collaborative articles (P < 0.0001). Furthermore, a significant difference was observed in comparing the average citations per article between these subcategories of articles (P ≤ 0.0001).
|Table 4: The differences observed among the articles published by a single institute as compared to collaborative articles|
Click here to view
The top three institutions according to the number of articles contributed to the top 50 articles were the University of Helsinki (n = 6, 461 citations), the University of Washington (n = 4, 688 citations), and the Hospital for sick children, Toronto (n = 3, 286 citations).
One hundred and ninety-three authors contributed to the top 50-cited articles. The number of authors in each article ranged from 1 to 26, with a median of 3. The top 3 contributors are Alberto Peña (n = 10, 1245 citations), Risto J Rintala (n = 8, 583 citations), and Harry Gustav Lindahl (n = 6, 468 citations).
The most cited topic was related to the “associated condition” in ARM. The number of papers on various topics on ARM and their citations is depicted in [Table 5]. A note must be made of the total number of papers add up to more than 50 as the asterisked marked topics have been combinedly dealt with in some articles, which therefore have been accounted separately under each topic.
|Table 5: Detailed analysis of the topic of research of the top 50 most cited articles in anorectal malformation|
Click here to view
The distribution of the article based on the type is illustrated in [Figure 2]. The original experiments were further subcategorized into six types based on the research methodology used.
|Figure 2: The distribution of different types of articles with their corresponding numbers (n) and citations (in parentheses)|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
The number of citations an article receives showcases the interests of the researchers in that particular subject. Studying the frequently cited articles provides information on the important topics and the attention and growth in research a particular area has received. When the bibliometric analysis of the research pertaining to ARM was performed, it was noticed that the most frequently cited topic was on associated congenital anomalies. This pattern is expected since ARM can have a myriad of associated conditions. Any publication dealing with an ARM is bound to discuss this aspect of ARM in the manuscript and quote the findings of previous papers on this topic. The same argument holds true to explain the fact that the highest citation was received by a manuscript by Quan et al. titled “VATER association-vertebral defects, anal atresia, T-E fistula with esophageal atresia (EA), radial and renal dysplasia– spectrum of associated defects.” This study is the original description of VATER association and since then has not only gathered the highest citation in ARM (n = 470) but also topped the rankings in a bibliometric analysis conducted on EA by Feng et al.
The classification of ARM has also changed as the understanding of this complex malformation got refined. The basis of uniform documentation of any case of ARM is a proper categorization of the defect per se only when uniform documentation and categorization has achieved the results of a particular technique or a treating center can be compared, and inferences are drawn. This led to the development of the “Krickenbeck Classification” of ARM in 2005. The article contains the summary of 26 international experts in the ARM workshop, which has been the second-highest cited article in ARM to date.
As far as the proportion of articles published in the pediatric surgery-specific journal or nonpediatric surgery-specific journal is concerned, the top 50 cited articles showed no difference. In contrast to the bibliometric study done by Feng et al. on EA, they observed that one-third of total articles on EA were in pediatric surgery-specific journals. Furthermore, we did not observe any difference in the quality of articles between these two subcategories of articles as assessed by the citations received per article in the two categories. This is in sharp contrast to the findings of Feng et al., as they had noted that the highest citations received per article were from the articles that were published in high-impact nonpediatric surgery journals. Their speculation was that the authors of original articles bearing significant research work and results on EA probably preferred to submit their results in high-impact journals with a wider audience and specialties rather than in journals directed to only the pediatric surgery community. Unlike their speculation, our findings highlight that ARM per se is a condition which is mainly managed by pediatric surgeons, in comparison to the multimodality approach in EA where the role of a pediatrician/neonatology is significant, and therefore, influential research work in EA could find a place in nonpediatric surgery-specific journals also. Furthermore, one can note that the citations and the citations per article received [Table 3] in the pediatric surgery-specific journals are marginally less than that of nonpediatric surgery journals. One must not, therefore, consider the papers in pediatric surgery journals being inferior to those of nonpediatric surgery journals; rather, it may be the phenomena of a larger audience and wider dispersion of the articles in nonpediatric surgery journal playing a role in accruing higher citations.
The time period between 2000 and 2009 saw the publication of the greatest number of influential articles in ARM. This finding is explainable since research in ARM and pediatric surgery has grown exponentially, and every new research work has a tendency to quote the recent most relevant article in the field. The older articles are generally not the first choice unless the author does not have an appropriate option to choose. The effect of duration of exposure of an article to the scientific community upon the citation count received is also exemplified by the figures obtained between the time period 2010 and 2019, which is the lowest.
From our findings, it would not be wrong to state that pioneering research work in ARM has originated from institutes in the USA, followed by centers in Europe (Finland and Netherlands) and Canada. The highest number of articles in the list of top 50 was published in the JPS. It is noteworthy to note that the JPS is the official journal of several professional societies (Section on Surgery of the American Academy of Pediatrics, the British Association of Paediatric Surgeons, the American Pediatric Surgical Association, the Canadian Association of Paediatric Surgeons, and the Pacific Association of Pediatric Surgeons). Therefore, it is easy to assimilate the conditions leading JPS to be receiving high-standard articles and subsequently publishing the highest number of influential papers in ARM. When we compared single-institution authored articles and those that had collaboration from multiple institutions, it was noted that the number of articles, total citations, and citations received per article were significantly more among the collaborative articles. Feng et al. in their bibliometric study on EA also noted that half of the best-connected authors were responsible for the most productive and most cited authors in their study. This leads to prove that a collaborative research and publication have higher chances of adding value to the paper as far as receiving higher citations is concerned and can become relatively more influential compared to those articles which are authored by single institution only.
Among the authors, the top names are Alberto Pena, Risto J Rintala, and Harry Gustav Lindahl. While Pena A (USA) revolutionized, the surgical management of ARM by introducing the concept of posterior sagital anorectoplasty, Rintala RJ, and Lindahl GH's articles predominantly emphasized the long-term outcomes of patients of ARM by longitudinal follow-up of a large cohort of ARM patients even up to their adulthood.
The most common topic among the most cited articles in ARM was “associated conditions” in ARM followed closely by “outcome.” The outcome of management is what we look forward to as surgeons. As mentioned before, the surgical reconstructive technique has evolved over decades, and the acceptance of any particular technique is bound to happen when the results of such a technique are showcased, discussed, endorsed by all, and modified as required. Long-term outcomes and quality of life-related topics are also important since the surgery is performed in a child who has an entire life span ahead of him. These longitudinal “outcome” results provide a very important facet of the surgical management of ARM as the child becomes an adult. Such “outcome-”based papers are therefore bound to get repeated citations in the newer publications dealing with ARM. The etiology and molecular mechanisms for aberrations leading to the occurrence of ARM in the fetus are also the focus of study, as evidenced by five articles among the rankings. As laparoscopy has also become an accepted modality of surgical treatment for select cases of ARM, more and more articles are being published with modification, early and long-term results of the minimally invasive surgery for the management of ARM. Such studies must have cited Georgeson et al. for quoting the first description of laparoscopy in ARM, and therefore, this article has found a place among the top 50 cited articles. It was notable that an important area of research on ARM, i.e., animal models did not find a place in our list. A similar observation was also made by Feng et al. in their study of top 100 cited articles on EA where only two articles on animal models were present in their listing.
A significant proportion of articles in this list of top-cited articles is retrospective studies on a cohort of patients. It was striking to note that meta-analysis and systematic reviews, which form the top rank in the pyramid of the level of evidence, are lacking in this list. This could be explained by the fact that it is technically difficult to design a prospective randomized controlled trial in a rare disease in which a lot of anatomical variation and heterogeneity exists among different patients. Hence, randomized studies in ARM are far and few, and therefore, articles based on meta-analysis and randomized control trials are underrepresented in our study.,
There are some limitations to this analysis that merits discussion. The citation count is a dynamic value, and hence, our analysis is akin to taking a snapshot which is bound to get modified over time as research continues to evolve. One may also note that a citation count does not reflect whether it is a citation made in a positive or a negative context in a particular article. It is also known that the type of article also matters; for example, meta-analyses or systematic reviews tend to gather more citations than others. Articles published earlier get more exposure to the scientific community and therefore have more probability of accumulating higher citations than those which are published recently. The “Web of Science” citation numbers might not be wholly representative of the true citation count as many available manuscripts may not have been included under its purview. The utilization of multiple databases can generate a higher citation number. Several biases such as institutional bias, self-citation, powerful person, and language bias have not been factored in this study, and these could have affected the manuscript's rankings. Finally, only the first six authors were considered for analysis, and publications that were coauthored by more than six authors may appear to be under-represented by our study design.
| Conclusion|| |
This bibliometric analysis is the first in the field of pediatric surgery to provide a list of the top 50 cited articles dedicated to ARM. Through this study, the research areas and major academic publications pertaining to ARM were identified. This analysis of the citation count would provide a reference for quoting the most influential papers in the field of ARM in future publications.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Peña A, Devries PA. Posterior sagittal anorectoplasty: Important technical considerations and new applications. J Pediatr Surg 1982;17:796-811.
Paladugu R, Schein M, Gardezi S, Wise L. One hundred citation classics in general surgical journals. World J Surāg 2002;26:1099-105.
Loonen MP, Hage JJ, Kon M. Plastic surgery classics: Characteristics of 50 top-cited articles in four plastic surgery journals since 1946. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008;121:320e-7e.
Fan KS, Leung KH, Fan KH, Chan J. Top 100 most influential manuscripts in congenital abdominal pediatric surgery: A bibliometric analysis. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg 2021;26:6-10. [Full text]
Chan J, Mak TL, Chu TS, Hui TL, Kwan LY. The 100 most cited manuscripts in coronary artery bypass grafting. J Card Surg 2019;34:782-7.
Dhua AK, Jain D, Goel P, Jain V, Yadav DK, Bajpai M. Analysis of top ten-cited articles published in the journal of Indian association of pediatric surgeons over a 10-year period. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg 2021;26:23-6. [Full text]
Quan L, Smith DW. The VATER association. Vertebral defects, anal atresia, T-E fistula with esophageal atresia, radial and renal dysplasia: A spectrum of associated defects. J Pediatr 1973;82:104-7.
Feng X, Martynov I, Suttkus A, Lacher M, Mayer S. Publication trends and global collaborations on esophageal atresia research: A bibliometric study. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2021;31:164-71.
Holschneider A, Hutson J, Peña A, Beket E, Chatterjee S, Coran A, et al.
Preliminary report on the international conference for the development of standards for the treatment of anorectal malformations. J Pediatr Surg 2005;40:1521-6.
Georgeson KE, Inge TH, Albanese CT. Laparoscopically assisted anorectal pull-through for high imperforate anus--a new technique. J Pediatr Surg 2000;35:927-30.
Lauriti G, Di Renzo D, Lelli Chiesa P, Zani A, Pierro A. One-stage repair of anorectal malformations in females with vestibular fistula: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatr Surg Int 2019;35:77-85.
Han Y, Xia Z, Guo S, Yu X, Li Z. laparoscopically assisted anorectal pull-through versus posterior sagittal anorectoplasty for high and intermediate anorectal malformations: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2017;12:e0170421.
Smith R. Beware the tyranny of impact factors. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008;90:125-6.
Royle P, Kandala NB, Barnard K, Waugh N. Bibliometrics of systematic reviews: Analysis of citation rates and journal impact factors. Syst Rev 2013;2:74.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2]
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5]